Private Enforcement of Antitrust Law in the EU, UK and USA/ (Registro n. 1217)

006 - Campo Fixo - Material Adicional
fixed length control field a|||||r|||| 00| 0
007 - Campo Fixo - Descrição Física
fixed length control field ta
008 - Campo de Tamanho Fixo
Campo fixo de controle local 190617s1999 enk gr 000 0 eng u
020 ## - ISBN
ISBN 0198268688
040 ## - Fonte da Catalogação
Fonte de catalogação BR-BrCADE
090 ## - Número de Chamada
Localização na estante 341.3787 C637p
Cutter C637p
100 10 - Autor
Autor CLIFFORD, A. Jones
245 10 - Titulo Principal
Título principal Private Enforcement of Antitrust Law in the EU, UK and USA/
260 ## - Editora
Cidade Oxford, Inglaterra:
Editora Oxford University Press,
Data 1999.
300 ## - Descrição Física
Número de páginas 263 p.
505 ## - Conteúdo
Conteúdo CONTENTS<br/><br/>Preface<br/>Table of Cases <br/>Table of Treaties and Legislation <br/>Abbreviations <br/><br/>Introduction <br/><br/>1. Introduction to Comparative Antitrust Systems<br/>1.1 The Rationale for Comparative Analysis <br/>1.1.1 Foundations of Comparative Antitrust<br/>1.1.2 Pitfalls of Similarity <br/>1.2 The US System: The Federal Antitrust Laws <br/>1.2.1 The Trust Problem <br/>1.2.2 The Sherman Act <br/>1.2.3 The Clayton Act <br/>1.2.4 Other Antitrust Legislation <br/><br/>2. Antitrust Enforcement in the USA <br/>2.1 Decentralized Enforcement in the USA <br/>2.1.1 Federal Enforcement: Department of justice and FTC <br/>2.1.2 Private Enforcement <br/>2.1.3 State Enforcement <br/>2.2 The Litigation Model and Exemptions in the USA <br/>2.2.1 Statutory Exemptions in US Antitrust <br/>2.2.2 Judicially-created Exemptions <br/>2.2.3 Consequences of the US Litigation Model <br/>2.3 A Primer on the US Federal Court System <br/><br/>3. The EC System: The Treaty of Rome and Regulation 17 <br/>3.1 The Birth of EC Competidon Law <br/>3.2 Article 81 (formerly 85) and Regulation 17 <br/>3.3 Article 82 (formerly 86) and the Merger Regulations <br/>3.4 Private Actions Not Expressly Provided For<br/><br/>4. The UK Systems: From Administration to Prohibition<br/>4.1 Historical Notes on Treble Damages under English Law <br/>4.2 The Post-war Administrative System <br/>4.3 The UK Competition Act 1998: A New Prohibition System? <br/><br/>5. Foundations of Private Enforcement in the Community <br/>5.1 Introduction: Covenants without Swords? <br/>5.2 The Treaty of Rome and the Community Order <br/>5.3 Direct Effect and the Competition Rules <br/>5.3.1 The Primary Line of Direct Effect Decisions <br/>5.3.2 The Secondary Line of Decisions: The Bosch Puzzle <br/>5.3.3 A Modest Reconciliation? <br/>5.4 The Supremacy of EC Law and the Competition Rules <br/><br/>6. Remedy Principles and the Competition Rules <br/>6.1 The National Remedy Principle and the Competition Rules <br/>6.2 Francovich: The Community Remedy Principle <br/>6.3 The 'Sons' of Francoviciz Private Damages Actions for Breach of the Competition Rules <br/><br/>7. Aspects of Private Antitrust Enforcement <br/>7.1 The Private Enforcement System in the USA <br/>7.2 Private Enforcement in the Community System <br/>7.2.1 The Limited Use of Private Enforcement in the Community <br/>7.2.2 Objections to Private Enforcement in the Community <br/><br/>8. Enforcement Pluralism in the Community System <br/>8.1 Concurrent Jurisdiction <br/>8.2 The Co-operation Notice <br/>8.3 Limits on the Duty to Stay Actions <br/>8.4 Narrow Constructionism: The Illusion of Exclusivity <br/>8.5 The Effect of Commission Decisions on Parties before the National Courts Postscript on Reform of Regulation <br/><br/>9. The Legal Basis of Private Actions in the UK under Community Law <br/>9.1 The Search for a National Cause of Action <br/>9.2 The New Torts Approach <br/>9.3 The Economic Torts Approach <br/>9.3.1 Inducement of Breach of Contract <br/>9.3.2 Intimidation <br/>9.3.3 Unlawful Interference with Trade of Business <br/>9.3.4 Conspiracy <br/><br/>10. Community Antitrust Claims as a Breach of Statutory Duty <br/>10.1 Judicial Authority <br/>10.2 The Elements of the Tort of Breach of Statutory Duty <br/>10.3 Evaluation of the Statutory Duty Approach <br/><br/>11. UK Antitrust Claims as a Breach of Statutory Duty <br/>11.1 The National Treatment Principle and Community Claims in the UK <br/>11.2 The Position in Scotland: Discrimination Revealed? <br/>11.3 Breach of Statutory Duty under the Competition Act 1998 <br/><br/>12. The Community (Antitrust) Remedy Solution <br/>12.1 New Torts and Old Bottles <br/>12.2 Translation not Allowed <br/>12.3 Is the Remedy National or Community in Nature? <br/><br/>13. Prudential Limitations on Private Actions <br/>13.1 Ripples and Floodgates: The Universal Plaintiff Problem <br/>13.2 Persons <br/>13.3 Business or Property <br/>13.4 By Reason of <br/><br/>14. Limits on Permissible Private Plaintiffs in US law <br/>14.1 Standing to Sue (Locus Stand) <br/>14.2 Article III Standing Distinguished <br/>14.3 The 'Direct Injury' Test <br/>14.4 The Target Arca Test <br/>14.5 The Zone of Interests Test <br/>14.6 The Factual Matrix Test <br/>14.7 The Multi-factor Test: Out of the Analytical Swamp?<br/><br/>15. Special Issues of Standing and Antitrust Injury <br/>15.1 The Antitrust Injury' Doctrine <br/>15.2 The Indirect Purchaser Rule: Passing On <br/>15.3 Preferred Plaintiffs: Consumers and Competitors <br/>15.4 Distribution Restraints <br/><br/>16. Limits on Permissible Private Plaintiffs under EC Law <br/>16.1 Locus Standi in Private Community Antitrust <br/>16.2 Direct Effect and Antitrust Locus Standi <br/>16.3 Locus Standi and the Division of Powers<br/>16.4 The Antitrust Injury Limitation in the Community? <br/>16.5 Indirect Purchasers and Passing-on in the Community<br/> <br/>17. Antitrust Damages Principles in US Law <br/>17.1 The Role of Damage Rules in Private Actions <br/>17.2 General Types of Recoverable Damages <br/>17.3 The Fact of Injury Must be Strictly Proven <br/>17.4 The Measurement of Damages may be Estimated <br/>17.4.1 Just and Reasonable Estimates, but Not Speculation <br/>17.4.2 Plaintiffs have Flexibility in Choosing a Mode of Proof <br/>17.4.3 Disaggregation of Damages may be Required <br/>17.4.4 Offsetting Benefits Must be Taken into Account <br/>17.4.5 Mitigation of Damages is Required<br/><br/>18. How Damages are Calculated in Particular Cases <br/>18.1 Overcharges and 'Enhanced Price' Damages <br/>18.2 Lost Profit and Diminished Revenue Damages <br/>18.3 The Terminated Business <br/>18.4 Damages Studies and their Flaws <br/><br/>19. Damage Principies in CommunityAntitrust Cases <br/>19.1 Misperceptions of the Importance of 'Trebie' Damages: Na Overview <br/>19.2 Lack of Pre-judgment Interest Makes Treble Damages Single <br/>19.3 Pre-judgment Interest in the Community: Are Single Damages Treble? <br/>19.4 Exemplary Damages in UK Courts <br/>19.5 Limited Application of Article (now 288) Case Law <br/>19.6 Damages in Community Antitrust Cases in the UK Compared to US Damage Rules <br/>19.6.1 Reasonable Estimation of Damages <br/>19.6.2 Heads of Damages <br/><br/>20. Conclusions: The Labours of Sisyphus <br/><br/>Bibliography <br/><br/>Index <br/><br/>
942 ## - Elementos de Entrada Adicionados
Tipo de Material Livros
942 ## - Elementos de Entrada Adicionados
Tipo de Material Livros
942 ## - Elementos de Entrada Adicionados
Tipo de Material Livros
Exemplares
Classificação Empréstimo Locação permanente Locação corrente Data de aquisição Forma de aquisição Patrimônio Número completo de chamada Código de barras Número do exemplar Data de inserção do exemplar Tipo de item no Koha
    Biblioteca Agamenon Magalhães Biblioteca Agamenon Magalhães 2019-08-23 Compra 31144 341.3787 C637p 2019-0602 1 2019-08-23 Livros
    Biblioteca Agamenon Magalhães|(61) 3221-8416| biblioteca@cade.gov.br| Setor de Edifícios de Utilidade Pública Norte – SEPN, Entrequadra 515, Conjunto D, Lote 4, Edifício Carlos Taurisano, térreo