Annual proceedings of the Fordham Competition Law Institute: (Registro n. 1493)

006 - Campo Fixo - Material Adicional
fixed length control field a|||||r|||| 00| 0
007 - Campo Fixo - Descrição Física
fixed length control field ta
008 - Campo de Tamanho Fixo
Campo fixo de controle local 190617s9999 xx 000 0 und d
020 ## - ISBN
ISBN 9781578233243
040 ## - Fonte da Catalogação
Fonte de catalogação BR-BrCADE
090 ## - Número de Chamada
Localização na estante 341.3787 A615
Cutter A615
245 10 - Titulo Principal
Título principal Annual proceedings of the Fordham Competition Law Institute:
Subtítulo International Antitrust Law & Policy: 2010/
260 ## - Editora
Cidade Nova Iorque, Estados Unidos:
Editora Juris Publishing,
Data 2011.
300 ## - Descrição Física
Número de páginas 466 p.
505 ## - Conteúdo
Conteúdo TABLIE OF CONTENTS<br/><br/>Foreword <br/><br/>Summary Table of Contents <br/><br/>Table of Contents<br/><br/>Chapter 1<br/><br/>SHAREHOLDER LIABILITY FOR JOINT VENTURE INFRINGEMENTS<br/>by<br/>Jolling K. de Pree & Stefan C.H.Molin<br/><br/>1. Introduction <br/>II. Legal Basis for Attribution of Liability: Single Economic Unit <br/>III. Joint Venture + Shareholders = Single Economic Unit?<br/>A. Full-Function Joint Ventures <br/>B. Other Joint Ventures<br/><br/>IV. Imposition of Fines / Joint and Several Liability<br/><br/>V. Conclusion <br/><br/>Chapter 2<br/><br/>COMPETITION POLICY IN MEXICO: A TALE OF A DEVELOPING COUNTRY<br/>by<br/>Eduardo Pérez Motta <br/><br/>1. Introduction<br/>II. Competition Regime<br/>III. Enforcement of FLEC: Relative Monopolistic Practices<br/>IV. Competition and Economic Development <br/>V. Second Generation Amendments to the FLEC<br/>VI. Bibliography<br/><br/>FORDHAM COMPETITION LAW INSTITUTE<br/><br/>Chapter 3<br/><br/>BRAZILIAN ANTITRUST ENFORCEMENT: GENERAL OVERVIEW AND RECENT TRENDS<br/>by<br/>Barbara Rosenberg et al<br/><br/>1. Merger Control<br/>A. Historical Context<br/>B. General Overview of the Brazilian Merger Review Process<br/>II. Cracking Cartels in Brazil <br/>A. General Overview of the Brazilian Conduct Investigations <br/>B. Investigation Proceedings <br/>C. Leniency / Amnesty Programme<br/>D. Cease-and-desist commitments or settlements (a Brazilian plea bargaining)?<br/>E. Short Note on Criminal Enforcement<br/>F. Trends<br/><br/>Chapter 4<br/><br/>BRAZIL'S ANTI-CARTEL ENFORCEMENT: THE CHANGING LANDSCAPE<br/>by<br/>Mariana Tavares de Araujo and Ana Paula Martinez<br/><br/>Chapter 5<br/><br/>ENFORCERS' PERSPECTIVES ON INTERNATIONAL ANTITRUST<br/>by<br/>A. Paul Victor<br/>Alexander Italianer<br/>Jon Leibowitz<br/>Mariana Tavares de Araujo<br/>Jolling K. de Pree<br/>Barbara Rosenberg<br/><br/>Panel Discussion<br/><br/>TABLE OF CONTENTS <br/><br/>Chapter 6<br/><br/>THE UNILATERAL EFFECTS ANALYSIS IN THE 2010 HORIZONTAL MERGER GUIDELINES: BEGINNING OF THE END OF THE AGE OF RESTRAINT?<br/>by<br/>Kevin J. Arquit<br/><br/>1. Introduction <br/>II. The Evolution of the Guidelines Away From Their Role as a Constraint on Agency Discretion and Toward Their Use as a Tool of Increased Enforcement <br/>A. Evolution of the Guidelines <br/>III. The Pendulum Swings: Unilateral Effects in the 2010 Revised Guidelines <br/>A. The 2010 Revisions Signify Greater Ambition to Intervene But Appear Not to Contain Any Overall Guiding Doctrine or Limiting Principle <br/>B. The Revised Guidelines Include Several Changes Regarding Unilateral Effects Intended to Expand Agency Discretion <br/>C. Four Areas Pose the Greatest Problems Regarding Unilateral Effects: Upward Pricing Pressure, Merger Simulation, Innovation, and Variety <br/>D. The 2010 Revised Guidelines Create Uncertainty Concerning Not Only How the Agencies Will Act, But Also How Courts Will React to the Changes<br/>IV. Conclusion<br/><br/>Chapter 7<br/><br/>UNILATERAL EFFECTS IN EUROPEAN MERGER ANALYSIS<br/>by<br/>Thorsten Mager<br/><br/>I. Introduction<br/>II. Determining Unilateral Effects by Means of the Dominance and Siec Test<br/>A. The "Old" European Merger Regulation<br/>B. Heinz/Beech-Nut <br/>C. The "New" European Merger Regulation<br/>FORDHAM COMPETITION LAW INSTITUTE<br/>III. Analysis of the EU Commission's Case Law<br/>A. Volvo/Renault Vi<br/>B. Philips/Agilent Health Care Solutions <br/>C. Philips! Marconi Medical Systems <br/>D. Oracle! PeopleSoft <br/>E. Ryanair/Aer Lingus<br/>F. Arsenal/DSP<br/>IV. Conclusion<br/><br/>Chapter 8<br/><br/>PRICING OF DIFFERENTIATED PRODUCTS IN THE 2010 HORIZONTAL MERGER GUIDELINES: SOME UNANSWERED QUESTIONS<br/>by<br/>Michael N. Sohn<br/><br/>1. The Role of Market Definition in AnaIyzing Pricing Effect<br/><br/>II. Diversion Ratios and Upward Pricing Pressure <br/><br/>Chapter 9<br/><br/>UNILATERAL EFFECTS IN MERGER ANALYSIS<br/>by<br/>Kevin J. Arquit<br/>Joseph Farrell<br/>Thorsten Mager<br/>Miguel de Ia Mano<br/>Alison Oldale<br/>Michael N. Sohn<br/><br/>Panel Discussion<br/><br/>TABLE OF CONTENN <br/><br/>Chapter 10<br/><br/>CARTELS IN THE EU: PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS FOR DEFENDANTS AND CLAIMANTS<br/>by<br/>David Anderson and Rachel Cuff<br/><br/>1. introduction <br/>II. The Defendant's View from Three Feet <br/>A. Raids and Inspections <br/>B. Access to the Commission's File<br/>C. Oral Hearing and the role of the Hearing Officer<br/>D Clarity of Procedural Steps <br/><br/>III. The Defendant's View from Three Thousand Feet<br/><br/>A. Leniency<br/>B. Levei of Fines <br/>C. Parental and Successor Liability<br/>D. Settlements<br/>E. Timing and Delay <br/>F. Transfer of Information Between Competition Authorities<br/><br/>III. The Defendant's View from Thirty Thousand Feet<br/><br/>A. The Commission as Legisiator, Prosecutor, Judge and Jury<br/>B. Impact of Possibility of Criminal Sanctions and Extradition<br/>C. Impact of Human Rights Argument <br/>D. Impact of Increase in Damages Actions<br/>E. A Time for Change?<br/><br/>IV. The View from the Other Side: Damages Claimants <br/><br/>A. Obstacies to Effective Damages Actions, and Possible Fixes<br/>B. Public and Private Enforcement Never the Twain Shall Meet or a New Way Forward?<br/>V. Moving Forward: Are We on the Right Path?<br/><br/>FORMAM COMPETITION LAW INSTITUTE<br/><br/>Chapter 11<br/><br/>NATIONAL JUDGES AND THE APPLICATION OF REGULATION 1/2003: REMARKS AND PROPOSALS<br/>by<br/>Enrico Adriano Raffaelli<br/><br/>1. Introduction<br/>II. Interaction Between National Judges and European Commission In Implementing EU Antitrust Law Pre-" Modernisation"<br/>III. Evaluation of the Functioning of the New Rules Over Their First Five Years of Application<br/>A. The Cooperation Instruments Provided by Article 15 (Cooperation with National Courts) <br/>B. The Binding Effect of European Commission Decisions Introduced by Article 16(1)<br/>C. The Codification of the European Commission's Supremacy<br/>IV. Critical Aspects of the Framework Introduced by Regulation1/2003<br/>A. Risk of Limiting National Judges' Independence <br/>B. Preliminary Reference under Regulation 1/2003: Remarks and Unresolved Issues<br/>C. The Binding Effect of Commission Decisions and Its Impact on Res Judicata <br/>D. The Peculiar, Institutional Nature of the European Commission<br/>E. Challenging the Compatibility of Article 16 of Regulation 1/2003 with the concept of due process and other fundamental principles <br/>V. Conclusions and Proposals <br/><br/>Chapter 12<br/><br/>EU COMPETITION POLICY<br/>by<br/>Laurence Sorkin<br/>David Anderson<br/>Enrico Adriano Raffaelli<br/>Rein Wesseling<br/><br/>Panel Discussion <br/><br/>TABLE OF CONTENTS <br/><br/>Chapter 13 <br/><br/>COMPETITION POLICY, ABUSIVE DOMINANCE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: SOME REFLECTIONS <br/>by <br/>Maher M. Dabbah <br/><br/>I. Overview<br/>II. The "Contexts" of the Topic <br/>III. The Different Types <br/>IV. Is Abusive Dominance a Serious Issue in the Developing World?<br/>V. Under-Enforcement Against Abusive Dominance <br/><br/>A. The " Dominance" of Anti-cartel Enforcement and Competition Advocacy <br/>B. The Perception of Abusive Dominance Cases as "Hard" Cases<br/>C. The Question of Resources <br/>D. The Provisions, of the Law<br/>E. Political Constraints <br/><br/>VI. An International Perspective <br/>VII. A Comment On Exploitative Abuses <br/>VIII. Conclusions <br/><br/>Chapter 14<br/><br/>ABUSE OF DOMINANCE, COMPETITION LAW AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: A VIEW FROM THE SOUTHERN TIP OF AFRICA<br/>by<br/>D.M. Davis<br/><br/>1. The South African Response<br/>II. The Role of the Doctrine of Abuse of Dominance<br/>III. Economic Development <br/>IV. The Need for Responsible Legislation<br/>V. The Potential Dangers<br/>VI. Conclusion<br/><br/>FORDHAM COMPETITION LAW INSTITUTE<br/><br/>Chapter 15<br/><br/>COMPETITION POLICY, ABUSIVE DOMINANCE AND ECONOMJC DEVELOPMENT<br/>by<br/>Tad Lipsky<br/><br/>1. Introduction<br/>II. Lessons of the Past<br/><br/>Chapter 16<br/><br/>COMPETITION POLICY, ABUSE OF DOMINANCE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES<br/>by<br/>Frédéric Jenny<br/>Maher Dabbah<br/>Dennis Davis<br/>Wilhiam Kovacic<br/>Tad Lipsky<br/>Eduardo Pérez Motta<br/><br/>Panel Discussion<br/><br/>Chapter 17<br/><br/>LUNCHEON ADDRESS<br/>by<br/>Ken Auietta<br/><br/>TABLE OF CONTENTS <br/><br/>Chapter 18<br/><br/>ANTITRUST IN THE DIGITAL ENVIRONMENT<br/>by<br/>Daniel A. Crane<br/>John Frank<br/>Julia Holtz<br/>Lawrence A. Jacobs<br/>Miguel de Ia Mano<br/>Damien Neven<br/><br/>Carl Shapiro<br/><br/>Panel Discussion<br/>
700 1# - Entrada secundária - Nome Pessoal
9 (RLIN) 1133
Nome pessoa HAWK, Barry E.
Relação Editor
942 ## - Elementos de Entrada Adicionados
Tipo de Material Livros
942 ## - Elementos de Entrada Adicionados
Tipo de Material Livros
Exemplares
Classificação Empréstimo Locação permanente Locação corrente Data de aquisição Patrimônio Número completo de chamada Código de barras Número do exemplar Data de inserção do exemplar Tipo de item no Koha
    Biblioteca Agamenon Magalhães Biblioteca Agamenon Magalhães 2019-08-20 30972 341.3787 A615 2019-0549 1 2019-08-20 Livros
    Biblioteca Agamenon Magalhães|(61) 3221-8416| biblioteca@cade.gov.br| Setor de Edifícios de Utilidade Pública Norte – SEPN, Entrequadra 515, Conjunto D, Lote 4, Edifício Carlos Taurisano, térreo