Fairness versus Welfare/ (Registro n. 1545)
| 006 - Campo Fixo - Material Adicional | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | a|||||r|||| 00| 0 |
| 007 - Campo Fixo - Descrição Física | |
| fixed length control field | ta |
| 008 - Campo de Tamanho Fixo | |
| Campo fixo de controle local | 190617s2002 -us gr 000 0 eng u |
| 020 ## - ISBN | |
| ISBN | 674006224 |
| 040 ## - Fonte da Catalogação | |
| Fonte de catalogação | BR-BrCADE |
| 090 ## - Número de Chamada | |
| Localização na estante | 340.11 K17f |
| Cutter | K17f |
| 100 10 - Autor | |
| Autor | KAPLOW, Louis |
| 245 10 - Titulo Principal | |
| Título principal | Fairness versus Welfare/ |
| 260 ## - Editora | |
| Cidade | Massachusetts, Estados Unidos: |
| Editora | Harvard University Press, |
| Data | 2002. |
| 300 ## - Descrição Física | |
| Número de páginas | 544 p. |
| 505 ## - Conteúdo | |
| Conteúdo | CONTENTS<br/>Prologue<br/>Acknowledgments<br/><br/>PART ONE E FRAMEWORK<br/>1.Introduction <br/>II. Welfare Economics and Notions of Fairness <br/>A. Welfare Economics <br/>1. Individuais' Well-Being <br/>2. Social Welfare and individuais' Well-Being<br/>3. Comments on Social Welfare and the Distribution <br/>of Income <br/>4. Concluding Remark <br/>B. Notions of Fairness <br/>1. The Basic Nature of Notions of Fairness <br/>2. Further Comments on Notions of Fairness <br/>(a) Meaning<br/>(b) Nonconsequentialist Character <br/>(c) Ex Post Character 48<br/>(d) Concluding Remark<br/>C. Overview of Our Argument<br/>1. The Argument for Welfare Economics and against Notions of Fairness<br/>2. On the Rationale for Notions of Fairness<br/>D. Notions of Fairness and Social Norms <br/>1. The Nature of Social Norms<br/>2. Implications for the Role of Notions of Fairness<br/>in Legal Policy Analysis <br/><br/>PART TWC E ANALYSIS<br/>III.Torts <br/>A. Welfare Economics and Tort Law <br/>B. Notions of Fairness and Tort Law <br/>1. Notions of Fairness<br/>2. Comments on the Literature <br/>C. Welfare Economics versus Fairness in Paradigmatic Accident Situa tions<br/>1. Reciprocal Accidents <br/>(a) Description <br/>(b) Effects of the Legal Rules <br/>(c) Choice of Legal Rules Using Welfare Economics <br/>(d) Choice of Legal Rules Using Notions of Fairness <br/>(e) Why the Choice of Legal Rules Should Be Based Only on Individuais' Well-Being The Argument for Welfare Economics and against Notions of Fairness <br/>(ii) Comments on the Literature <br/>(iii) The Significance of the Possibility That All Individuais May Be Made Worse off under Any Notion of Fairness <br/>(f) The Apparent Mootness of Concerns for Fairness <br/>2. Nonreciprocal Accidents <br/>(a) Description <br/>(b) Effects of the Legal Rules<br/>(c) Choice of Legal Rules Using Welfare Economics <br/>(d) Choice of Legal Rules Using Notions of Fairness <br/>(e) Why the Choice of Legal Rules Should Be Based Only on Individuals' Well-Being <br/>D. Welfare Economics versus Fairness in Paradigmatic Accident Situations: The Case in Which Harrn Is Uncertain <br/>1. Reciprocal Accidents <br/>(a) Description <br/>(b) Effects of the Legal Rules <br/>(c) Choice of Legal Rules Using Welfare Economics <br/>(d) Choice of Legal Rules Using Notions of Fairness <br/>(e) Why the Choice of Legal Rules Should Be Based Only on Individuais' Well-Being <br/>(f) The Foregoing Reconsidered When Insurance Is Not Purchased <br/>(i)Victims Uninsured <br/>(ii)Injurers Uninsured <br/>2. Nonreciprocal Accidents <br/>E. The Appeal of Notions of Fairness and Its Implications <br/>1. Social Norms and Notions of Fairness <br/>2. Implications for the Role of Notions of Fairness in Legal Policy Analysis <br/>3. Remark on the Concepts of Injurer and Victim <br/>4. Remark on the Ex Post Character of Notions of Fairness <br/>F. The Extent to Which the Use of Notions of Fairness Has Led Us Astray <br/>IV. Contracts <br/>A. Welfare Economics and the Enforcement of Contracts <br/>B. Notions of Fairness and the Enforcernent of Contracts <br/>1. Promise-Keeping<br/>2. The View That Breach Is Akin to a Tort <br/>3. Further Comments on the Literature <br/>C. Welfare Economics versus Fairness and the Enforcernent of Contracts<br/>1. Complete Contracts <br/>(c) Choice of Legal Rules Using Welfare Economics <br/>(d) Choice of Legal Rules Using Notions of Fairness <br/>(e) Why the Choice of Legal Rules Should Be Based Only on Individuals' Well-Being <br/>D. Welfare Economics versus Fairness in Paradigmatic Accident Situations: The Case in Which Harrn Is Uncertain <br/>1. Reciprocal Accidents <br/>(a) Description <br/>(b) Effects of the Legal Rules <br/>(c) Choice of Legal Rules Using Welfare Economics <br/>(d) Choice of Legal Rules Using Notions of Fairness <br/>(e) Why the Choice of Legal Rules Should Be Based Only on Individuais' Well-Being <br/>(f) The Foregoing Reconsidered When Insurance Is Not Purchased<br/>(i)Victims Uninsured <br/>(ii) Injurers Uninsured <br/>2. Nonreciprocal Accidents <br/>E. The Appeal of Notions of Fairness and Its Implications <br/>1. Social Norms and Notions of Fairness <br/>2. Implications for the Role of Notions of Fairness in Legal Policy Analysis <br/>3. Remark on the Concepts of Injurer and Victim <br/>4. Remark on the Ex Post Character of Notions of Fairness <br/>F. The Extent to Which the Use of Notions of Fairness Has Led Us Astray <br/>IV. Contracts <br/>A. Welfare Economics and the Enforcement of Contracts<br/>B. Notions of Fairness and the Enforcernent of Contracts <br/>1. Promise-Keeping <br/>2. The View That Breach Is Akin to a Tort <br/>3. Further Comments on the Literature<br/>C. Welfare Economics versus Fairness and the Enforcernent of Contracts <br/>1. Complete Contracts <br/>(a) Description <br/>(b) Examination of Different Contracts <br/>(c) Effects of the Legal Rules <br/>(d) Choice of Legal Rules Using Welfare Economics <br/>(e) Choice of Legal Rules Using Notions of Fairness <br/>(f) Why the Choice of Legal Rules Should Be Based Only on Individuais' Well-Being <br/>(i)In Relation to Promise-Keeping <br/>(ii) In Relation to the View That Breach Is Akin to a Tort <br/>(iii) Summary <br/>2. Incomplete Contracts <br/>(a) Description <br/>(b) Effects of the Legal Rules <br/>(c) Choice of Legal Rules Using Welfare Economics <br/>(d) Choice of Legal Rules Using Notions of Fairness <br/>(e) Why the Choice of Legal Rules Should Be Based Only on Individuais' WelI-Being<br/>(i)In Relation to Promise-Keeping <br/>(ii) In Relation to the View That Breach Is Akin to a Tort <br/>(f) The Apparent Mootness and Arbitrariness of Concerns for Fairness <br/>(g) The Appeal of Notions of Fairness and Its Implications <br/>D. Additional Considerations <br/>1. Distribution of Income <br/>2. Advantage-Taking <br/>3. The Extent to Which the Use of Notions of Fairness Has Led Us Astray <br/>V. Legal Procedure <br/>A. Ability to Bring Suit <br/>1. Welfare Economics and the Ability to Bring Suit <br/>2. Notions of Fairness and the Ability to Bring Suit <br/>3. Description of a Basic Case <br/>4.Effects of the Legal Rales <br/>5.Normative Assessment <br/>(a) Choice of Legal Rules Using Welfare Economics <br/>(b) Choice of Legal Rules Using Notions of Fairness <br/>(c) Why the Choice of Legal Rules Should Be Based Only on Individuais' Weii-Being <br/>6.The Appeal of Notions of Fairness and Its Implications <br/>7.Remarks on the Generality of Our Resuits <br/>8.The Extent to Which the Use of Notions of Fairness Has Led Us Astray<br/>B. Accuracy in Adjudication <br/>1.Welfare Economics and Accuracy in Adjudication <br/>2.Notions of Fairness and Accuracy in Adjudication <br/>3.Basic Case: Accuracy in Assessing Damages and the Benefit of Inducing Behavior in Accordance with Legal Rales <br/>(a) Description <br/>(b) Effects of the Legal Rules <br/>(c) Choice of Legal Rules Using Welfare Economics <br/>(d) Choice of Legal Rales Using Notions of Fairness <br/>(e) Why the Choice of Legal Rules Should Be Based Only on Individuais' Well-Being <br/>(f) The Appeal of Notions of Fairness and Its Implications <br/>4.Variations: Accuracy in Determining Damages <br/>(a) Case in Which Injurers Do Not Know in Advance How Much Harm Victims Will Suifer <br/>(b) Case in Which Victims Are Risk Averse and Injurers Do Not Know in Advance How Much Harm Victims Will Suifer <br/>5.Variations: Accuracy in Determining Liabillty <br/>6.Remarks <br/>(a) The Generality of Our Results <br/>(b) Parties' Excessive Incentives to Invoke Procedures in Litigation <br/>7. The Extent to Which the Use of Notions of Fairness Has Lcd Us Astray <br/>C. Additional Reasons Why Legal Procedures May Be Valued <br/>1. Possible Tastes for Procedural Fairness <br/>2. Other Ways in Which Procedures May Enhance Individuais' Well-Being <br/>VI. Law Enforcement <br/>A. Welfare Economics and Law Enforcement <br/>B. Notions of Fairness and Law Enforcement <br/>1. Notions of Fairness <br/>2. Comments on the Literature <br/>C. Welfare Economics versus Fairness and Law Enforcement <br/>1. Fair Punishment and Deterrence in a Paradigm Case <br/>(a) Description <br/>(b) Behavior of Individuais under Different Sanctions<br/>(c) Choice of Sanction Using Welfare Economics <br/>(d) Choice of Sanction Using Notions of Fairness <br/>(e) Why the Choice of Sanction Should Be Based Only on Individuais' Well-Being <br/>(i)Effects on the Well-Being of Different Groups <br/>(ii) Actual Imposition of Unfair Punishment under the Two Approaches <br/>(iii) Comments on the Literature <br/>2. Variation of the Paradigm Case: Different Crimes <br/>3. Variation of the Paradigm Case: Imperfect Deterrence <br/>4. Variation of the Paradigm Case: Punishment of the Innocent <br/>(a) Analysis of a Basic Situation <br/>(b) Comments on the Literature <br/>D. The Appeal of Notions of Fairness and Its Implications <br/>1. The Origins and Functions of Notions of Fairness <br/>2. Implications for the Role of Notions of Fairness in Legal Policy Analysis <br/>3. Remark on the Ex Post Character of Notions of Fairness<br/>E. The Extent to Which the Use of Notions of Fairness Has Led Us Astray <br/><br/>PART THREE EXTENSIONS<br/>VII On the Use of Notions of Fairness and Welfare Economics<br/>by Different Types of Actors <br/>A. Ordinary Individuais <br/>B. Legal Academics <br/>1. The Appeal of Notions of Fairness to Legal Academics <br/>2. Why Legal Academics Shoald Be Guided by Welfare Economics <br/>3. Reminder of the Ways in Which Notions of Fairness Are Relevant for Legal Policy Analysis under Welfare Economics <br/>C. Government Decisionmakers <br/>VIII. Comments on the Breadth and Soundness of Welfare Economics <br/>A. Design of Legal Institutions <br/>1. Accuracy <br/>2. Controlling Government Officials' Behavior <br/>3. Legitimacy of Legal Institutions <br/>4. Administrative Costs <br/>B. Preftrences and Individuais' Well-Being <br/>1. Imperfect Information and Other Limitations on Individuals' Decisionmaking <br/>2. The Effect of the Law on Preferences <br/>3. Trumping Objectionable Preferences <br/>4. Tastes for Notions of Fairness <br/>C. Bad Luck and Inequality <br/>1. Bad Luck: Ex Ante versus Ex Post Evaluation <br/>2. Equality and Equal Treatment <br/>D. Additional Concerns about the Application of Welfare Economics <br/>1. Difficulty in Valuing Life, Pain and Suffering, and Other Nonpecuniary Factors <br/>2. Omission of "Soft" Variables <br/>3. Possible Costs of Permitting Market Trade <br/>4. Indeterminacy <br/>(a) Indeterminacy Due to Empirical Uncertainty <br/>(b) Conceptual Indeterminacy <br/>5. The Difficulty of Predicting the Behavior of Individuais, Who Are Not Always Rational<br/>Maximizers of Their Own WelI-Being <br/><br/>IX. Conclusion <br/>References <br/>Index <br/><br/><br/> |
| 700 1# - Entrada secundária - Nome Pessoal | |
| 9 (RLIN) | 791 |
| Nome pessoa | SHAVELL, Steven |
| Relação | Autor |
| 942 ## - Elementos de Entrada Adicionados | |
| Tipo de Material | Livros |
| 942 ## - Elementos de Entrada Adicionados | |
| Tipo de Material | Livros |
| Classificação | Empréstimo | Locação permanente | Locação corrente | Data de aquisição | Patrimônio | Número completo de chamada | Código de barras | Número do exemplar | Data de inserção do exemplar | Tipo de item no Koha |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biblioteca Agamenon Magalhães | Biblioteca Agamenon Magalhães | 2019-07-05 | 30261 | 340.11 K17f | 2019-0264 | 1 | 2019-07-05 | Livros | ||
| Biblioteca Agamenon Magalhães | Biblioteca Agamenon Magalhães | 2019-10-29 | 30262 | 340.11 K17f | 2019-1257 | 2 | 2019-10-29 | Livros | ||
| Biblioteca Agamenon Magalhães | Biblioteca Agamenon Magalhães | 2019-10-29 | 30263 | 340.11 K17f | 2019-1258 | 3 | 2019-10-29 | Livros |